Lighting burn-in inspection exposes LED products to continuous operation -- typically 24 hours or more -- to surface hidden defects before shipment. Inspectors monitor lumen output, thermal performance, and electrical stability throughout the test. Products that dim prematurely or generate excessive heat reveal reliability problems that would otherwise only appear after delivery. Real-time reporting allows quality teams to act on findings immediately, preventing defective units from reaching customers.

Burn-in inspection serves as a cornerstone in lighting quality control. By running LEDs continuously for 24 to 72 hours, inspectors can identify weak components and manufacturing defects that would not appear in brief power-on checks. Units that fail during this window -- a period known as "infant mortality" -- are removed before packaging, improving the overall reliability of the batch.
| Objective | Description |
|---|---|
| Detect early component failure | Running for 24-72 hours identifies failures before shipping |
| Identify defective components | Continuous operation reveals faulty LED chips or drivers before packaging |
Burn-in inspection subjects LEDs to prolonged operation, uncovering hidden defects in chips, drivers, and passive components. Inspectors track lumen output, thermal behavior, and electrical stability. Units that degrade beyond acceptable thresholds are flagged and removed from the batch. This process directly reduces field failure rates and strengthens long-term product reliability.
| Evidence | Implication for Field Failures |
|---|---|
| Burn-in identifies weak units before field operation | Reduces the likelihood of early failures after delivery |
| Units exceeding a degradation threshold are removed | Enhances product reliability across the batch |
| Failure mechanism analysis guides test design | Ensures the burn-in protocol targets the product's specific risk profile |
Tip: Burn-in inspection provides real-time feedback, allowing quality teams to make quick decisions about product conformity.
Inspectors arrange LEDs in controlled environments designed to simulate real-world conditions. Environmental aging tests expose lighting units to thermal cycling, humidity variation, and water spray. These conditions accelerate degradation, revealing early-life weaknesses that would otherwise take months to appear. Test parameters are customized based on product specifications and client requirements.
| Control Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Thermal Cycling | Alternating high and low temperatures to test thermal expansion resistance |
| Humidity Management | Simulates dew and moisture to assess corrosion of metals and coatings |
| Water Spray Simulation | Adjustable nozzle pressure to simulate long-term rain or acid rain effects |
| Data Logging | Continuous monitoring of irradiance, temperature, and humidity |
| Standard Test Conditions | Irradiance: 0.55 W/m2; Light-phase temp: 63 degrees C +/-3; Dark-phase temp: 50 degrees C +/-2; Humidity: 50% RH (light) / 90% RH (dark) |
During aging tests, inspectors record input current, power consumption, luminous efficacy, and color temperature at defined intervals. Changes in these values point to specific failure modes. Results are uploaded to an online platform in real time, giving clients immediate visibility of any anomalies alongside supporting photos and videos.
| Measurement | Initial Value | 4000-Hour Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input Current (A) | 1.33 | 1.29 | -3% |
| Power (W) | 15.2 | 15.4 | +1.3% |
| Luminous Efficacy (lm/W) | 67.8 | 64.7 | -4.6% |
| Color Temperature (K) | 4055 | 3987 | -1.7% |
Note: Real-time defect detection during aging tests helps manufacturers prevent faulty lighting from reaching customers.

Lumen depreciation describes the reduction in luminous flux over time, which signals underlying component degradation. Two industry standards govern this measurement:
| Standard | Description |
|---|---|
| IES LM-80 | Measures lumen depreciation of LED sources over 6,000 to 10,000 hours, recording luminous flux at regular intervals |
| IES TM-21 | Projects long-term lumen maintenance based on LM-80 data, predicting the L70 point (when output falls below 70% of initial value) |
Inspectors compare luminous flux, color temperature, and input power at the start and end of the burn-in period. If flux falls below the expected L70 maintenance threshold, the unit is flagged for review. This process prevents lighting products with accelerated degradation from reaching customers.
Poor thermal management is one of the most common root causes of LED failure. Inspectors evaluate enclosure temperature, component temperature, and junction temperature during burn-in testing. LEDs are operated at maximum-rated temperature under full load. Closed-loop chambers maintain stable test conditions while input voltage adjustments stress components to reveal hidden weaknesses.
Common heat dissipation defects include inadequate airflow design, undersized heat sinks, and missing or poor-quality thermal interface materials. These issues raise junction temperature, accelerating lumen depreciation and shortening useful life. The consequences of failing thermal standards include:
Tip: Effective thermal management and regular monitoring of luminous flux parameters help extend LED lifetime and ensure consistent lighting performance.
Inspectors compare burn-in results against established reliability benchmarks. Test duration directly affects how many failure modes are captured:
| Test Duration | Effectiveness |
|---|---|
| 2 hours | Catches immediate power-on failures only |
| 4-8 hours | Identifies most infant-mortality failures |
| 24 hours | Reveals weak components, manufacturing defects, and multiple failure modes |
Units showing significant lumen depreciation, abnormal temperature rise, or electrical instability are marked as failed and removed from the batch. Manufacturers use failure analysis data to adjust production processes and improve future reliability.
When units fail burn-in tests, inspectors take immediate corrective action. Common remediation steps include replacing faulty LED chips or drivers, diagnosing failing circuitry, and verifying that approved component substitutes perform to specification. Technicians document each failure and root cause. This data feeds back into production to prevent recurrence and improve long-term batch quality.
Quick action on non-conforming units protects product reliability and prevents performance degradation in the field.
Lighting burn-in inspection and the 24-hour aging test are essential tools for ensuring LED product reliability. By exposing products to realistic stress conditions before shipment and combining environmental aging with real-time reporting, quality teams can detect lumen depreciation, thermal defects, and early component failures while there is still time to act. Systematic inspection combined with structured failure analysis delivers measurable improvements in field reliability and customer satisfaction.
A 24-hour burn-in test exposes hidden defects by running LEDs continuously under rated conditions. Inspectors monitor brightness, temperature, and stability throughout the test. Only units that pass are approved for shipment.
Inspectors use calibrated photometric equipment to track luminous flux at the start and end of the burn-in period. If the output drop exceeds acceptable limits, the unit is flagged. Standards such as IES LM-80 and TM-21 provide the measurement and projection framework.
Excessive heat raises junction temperature, accelerating lumen degradation and shortening LED lifespan. Effective thermal management -- through heat sinks, thermal interface materials, and adequate airflow -- keeps junction temperatures within safe operating ranges.
Failed units are removed from the batch and quarantined. Inspectors document the defect type and root cause, then recommend corrective action. Manufacturers repair or replace non-conforming units before resubmitting for re-inspection.
Real-time reporting gives manufacturers immediate visibility of test results as inspectors collect them. Issues can be resolved on-site, reducing rework costs and shipment delays while maintaining full traceability of inspection findings. Click to learn more.
Click the button below to directly enter the TradeAider Service System. The simple steps from booking and payment to receiving reports are easy to operate.